![]() |
Media Release
DEMOCRACY WATCH FILES ETHICS COMPLAINTS AGAINST LOBBYISTS, CALLS FOR EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF NEW RULES
Monday, June 17, 2002
OTTAWA - At a news conference today, eight years after the Ethics Counsellor's first full day in office, Democracy Watch filed an open letter with Ethics Counsellor Howard Wilson requesting that he investigate and determine whether 9 lobbyists who have reportedly worked with either the Prime Minister, a Cabinet minister or opposition MP are breaking ethics rules for lobbyists (Please see letter set out below).
"You cannot have democratic government when lobbyists are working for politicians or political parties," said Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch. "Lobbyists represent private interests and politicians are legally required to uphold the public interest and tying the two together creates a clear conflict that is destructive to the public interest."
In his recently released so-called "ethics package, Prime Minister Chrétien set out a new ethics guideline for Cabinet ministers which states that a lobbyist cannot work for a minister on a personal political intitiative and also be a lobbyist.
Democracy Watch believes that this guideline is a legally incorrect, and very weak standard for conflicts of interest. Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code of Conduct states that: "Lobbyists shall not place public office holders in a conflict of interest by proposing or undertaking any action that would constitute an improper influence on a public office holder" and "public office holder" is defined as including all MPs and Senators. Among other rules, part II, sub-section 23(1) of the Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders states that "A public officer holder shall take care to avoid being placed or the appearance of being placed under an obligation to any person or organization, or the representative of a person or organization, that might profit from special consideration on the part of the office holder."
As a result of these rules, Democracy Watch believes that a conflict of interest exists when a lobbyist works with any minister (whether or not the lobbyist actively lobbies the same minister) because every minister is involved, through behind-closed-door Cabinet decision-making processes, with every Cabinet decision and therefore cannot have ties to any private interest without creating a conflict. Democracy Watch also believes that a conflict of interest exists when a lobbyist works with any public office holder because Democracy Watch believes that the common law definition of conflict of interest means that no public office holder can have ties to any private interest.
In other words, Democracy Watch believes that lobbyists cannot work with a public office holder in any way without causing a conflict of interest, and that Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code in effect means that lobbyists must choose between being a lobbyist and working with public office holders, political parties or candidates for public office.
"The ethics rules clearly draw a line that requires lobbyists to choose between being a lobbyist and working for a political party or politician," said Conacher. "The problem is that the rules are not being enforced strongly or fairly by a fully independent, fully empowered ethics commission. Instead, the rules are being weakly enforced by the Ethics Counsellor who has no independence because he is under the thumb of the Prime Minister."
In its letter to the Ethics Counsellor, Democracy Watch has filed a complaint about the following lobbyists working in the past for the following public office holders (Please see letter set out below for details):
- 30 -
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Coordinator
Tel: (613) 241-5179
dwatch@web.net
Democracy Watch's Government Ethics Campaign
PLEASE NOTE: Democracy Watch is filing these complaints without prejudice to the application it filed on December 3, 2001 in the Federal Court of Canada challenging, among other things the Ethics Counsellor's lack of independence that, Democracy Watch believes, means that the Ethics Counsellor cannot fairly or impartially uphold the Lobbyists' Code of Conduct.
PLEASE ALSO NOTE: Democracy Watch filed a complaint on April 13, 2000 with the Ethics Counsellor under the Lobbyists Code of Conduct about a lobbyist, Barry Campbell, organizing a fundraiser for a minister Campbell was registered to lobby, Secretary of State Jim Peterson. The Ethics Counsellor has neglected to rule on this complaint despite Democracy Watch's repeated requests for a ruling and the passing of over two years.
Text of June 17, 2002 Letter to Ethics Counsellor Howard Wilson
Howard Wilson
Ethics Counsellor
66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
Ottawa, Canada
K1A 0C9
Fax: (613) 995-7308
June 17, 2002
Dear Mr. Wilson:
We are filing this letter to request that you, in your legal position as enforcer of the federal Lobbyists' Code of Conduct (the LobbyistsÕ Code), investigate situations that Democracy Watch believes raise serious questions concerning violations of the federal LobbyistsÕ Code.
Democracy Watch believes that you personally are biased in fulfilling the role of enforcing the Lobbyists' Code because you also hold the separate legal position of compliance officer for the Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders (the Public Office Holders Code), and as a result you personally cannot fairly and impartially uphold the Lobbyists' Code. As you know, Democracy Watch has filed an application in Federal Court challenging, among other things, the legality of you holding both these positions. However, Democracy Watch is still filing this letter without prejudice to that court application because it believes that, if you are replaced by another person in the legal position of enforcer of the Lobbyists' Code, the position has sufficient independence and powers to fairly and impartially uphold the Lobbyists' Code as set out in sections 10.1 to 10.5 of the federal Lobbyists Registration Act, CHAPTER L-12.4 (R.S., 1985, c. 44 (4th Supp.)) (the Act).
The Lobbyists' Code covers all lobbyists required to register under the Act. Recent media reports have confirmed that the following 9 lobbyists, all of whom are registered under the Act to lobby the federal government, have been in the past for various lengths of time (and, in some cases, are still) working with the following ministers and public office holders on at least one private initiative of each minister or public office holder (and possibly other initiatives), namely running for the leadership of a political party:
By "working with" Democracy Watch means doing anything that benefits the minister or public office holder in any way.
Recent media reports have confirmed that most of these lobbyists have been working with a minister who heads a government department the lobbyist is lobbying (or recently stopped lobbying), as indicated in each lobbyist's registration in the registry of lobbyists.
Principles set out in the Lobbyists' Code require that all lobbyists follow "not only the letter but the spirit" of the Lobbyists' Code and all relevant laws, including the Lobbyists Registration ActÕs registration requirements, and that lobbyists conduct all their relations with "integrity and honesty" and "observe the highest professional and ethical standards."
In addition, Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code states the following:
"8. Improper influence Lobbyists shall not place public office holders
in a conflict of interest by proposing or undertaking any action that would
constitute an improper influence on a public office holder."
The Act defines public office holders, including all members of the House of Commons and the Senate (subsection 2(1)).
The Public Office Holders' Code requires ministers and others covered by the Code to adhere to the following rules (NOTE: "Every public office holder" (including, Democracy Watch believes, all members of the House of Commons and the Senate) is required to conform with the principles set out under Part I, section 3 of the Code, while only specific public office holders (defined in section 4 of the Code) are required to adhere to the other rules contained in the Code):
Democracy Watch believes that a reasonable interpretation and application of these rules in the Lobbyists' Code and the Public Office Holders Code, along with a reasonable interpretation of the common law standard for finding that a public office holder is in a "conflict of interest", would result in the conclusion that the 9 lobbyists named above have violated Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code.
Democracy Watch believes that the conclusion that a lobbyist has violated Rule 8 should be reached for any lobbyist that is working with any public office holder, whether or not the lobbyist is working with a minister whom the lobbyist is also lobbying, and whether or not the public office holder is a minister of the government.
Democracy Watch believes that a conflict of interest exists when a lobbyist works with any minister (whether or not the lobbyist actively lobbies the same minister) because every minister is involved, through behind-closed-door Cabinet decision-making processes, with every Cabinet decision and therefore cannot have ties to any private interest without creating a conflict. Democracy Watch also believes that a conflict of interest exists when a lobbyist works with any public office holder because Democracy Watch believes that the common law definition of conflict of interest means that no public office holder can have ties to any private interest.
In other words, Democracy Watch believes that lobbyists cannot work with a public office holder in any way without causing a conflict of interest, and that Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code in effect means that lobbyists must choose between being a lobbyist and working with public office holders, political parties or candidates for public office.
In your legal position as Ethics Counsellor enforcing the Lobbyists' Code, you are required under the Lobbyists Registration Act to investigate if you have a reasonable belief that a violation of the Lobbyists' Code has occurred. You have the full powers of a judge in your investigation (including the power to subpoena witnesses and compel evidence), and you are required to report your ruling to Parliament (via the Registrar General of Canada).
We believe that a full and detailed investigation, using all of your investigative powers, is justified and needed to determine whether the 9 lobbyists named above have violated Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code.
We therefore request that you use your full powers under the Act to investigate these situations, determine if any of the named lobbyists have violated Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code, and report your rulings on these lobbyists to Parliament, as you are legally required to do.
We also request that if you learn of other registered lobbyists working with ministers, meaning doing anything that benefits the minister in any way, that you initiate investigations into whether they are violating Rule 8 of the Lobbyists' Code.
The standard for evaluating activities of public office holders under the Public Office Holders Code is whether "real, potential or apparent conflicts of interest" have been created (emphasis added). This standard creates an affirmative obligation on all public office holders to avoid even potential or apparent conflicts of interest.
We look forward to your investigation of this matter, and await your reply.
Sincerely,
Duff Conacher, Coordinator
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Democracy Watch