![]() |
Media Release
RECORD 1997 POLITICAL DONATIONS BY BANKS COINCIDE
WITH
BANK ACT AMENDMENTS AND REVIEW OF MERGERS
Monday, July 6, 1998
OTTAWA - Democracy Watch today raised questions as to whether Canada's
Big Six banks used donations to influence the amendment of the Bank Act,
completed in the spring of 1997. The group released a comparison of the
1997 donations by the banks to the federal Liberal Party with previous
years' donations showing that the 1997 donations were higher than any past
year. In amending the Act, the Liberal government did not enact any of
the bank accountability or consumer-protection amendments proposed by many
citizen groups from across Canads.
Democracy Watch called on the Liberal Party to disclose 1998 donations
by the banks before the decision on the proposed bank mergers is made by
the government. "Sunshine is a good disinfectant against undue corporate
influence, and Canadians have a right-to-know how much the banks are donating
to political parties before major policy decisions are made" said
Aaron Freeman, Board Member of Democracy Watch, "We call on the parties,
and the Liberal Party in particular, to report 1998 donations before the
decision about the proposed bank mergers is made."
In 1997, the Big Six banks (CIBC, Royal Bank, Bank of Montreal, Bank of
Nova Scotia, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and National Bank) donated a total
of $581,007.52 to the federal Liberal Party. In addition, their subsidiaries
donated a total of $531,542.08 for a grand total of $1,112,549.60. This
is the largest amount that the Big Six banks and their subsidiaries have
ever donated to a federal political party, and is over almost twice as
much than in 1996 ($664,073.45), and more than double the amounts donated
in 1995 ($528,103.14) and in 1994 ($429,364.33).
Political donations are usually higher during election years. However,
the 1997 election-year donations by the Big Six banks and their subsidiaries
were 41% higher (about 30% higher taking inflation into account) than the
1993 election-year total of $784,114.66. The election campaign was shorter
in 1997 than in 1993 so, if anything, party expenses should have been lower.