[Democracy Watch Logo]


News Release

APPOINTMENTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS
SHOULD HAVE APPROVAL OF ALL PARTY LEADERS --
HEARINGS YESTERDAY, CONSERVATIVES’ ELECTION PLEDGES NOT ENOUGH 
TO CHECK PRIME MINISTER’S POWER

“If there are any other initiatives that align with our principles, we will attempt to make those changes as well.”
  Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking about the planned “Federal Accountability Act”
  January 26, 2006

Tuesday, February 28, 2006

OTTAWA - Today, Democracy Watch called on Prime Minister Stephen Harper, and the leaders of the other three federal political parties with elected MPs, to modify the Conservatives planned “Federal Accountability Act” to democratize the federal government’s appointment process for all positions involved in law enforcement, including judges and the boards and heads of all enforcement agencies, boards, tribunals and commissions.
 
Yesterday, in a public hearing Marshall Rothstein, Harper’s nominee for Supreme Court justice, was questioned in a very limited way by a committee of MPs.  While the hearing introduced transparency to the appointment process, the fact that the committee had no power to approve or reject the Prime Minister’s nominee means that the process did not, in any effective way, check the Prime Minister’s appointment power.
 
In the Conservatives’ election platform, they pledged to make the following changes:

“Ensure that all Officers of Parliament are appointed through consultation with all parties in the House of Commons and confirmed through a secret ballot of all Members of Parliament, not just named by the Prime Minister. This appointment process will cover: - The Ethics Commissioner - The Auditor General - The Chief Electoral Officer - The Information Commissioner - The Privacy Commissioner - The Registrar of Lobbyists; [and] Establish a Public Appointments Commission to set merit-based requirements for appointments to government boards, commissions, and agencies, to ensure that competitions for posts are widely publicized and fairly conducted.”
While the establishment of a Commission to ensure merit-based appointments will be a positive step forward, Democracy Watch believes that a secret ballot vote is not an effective check on the Prime Minister’s appointment power because if the ruling party holds a majority of seats in Parliament, it is very likely that MPs from the ruling party will rubber-stamp the Prime Minister’s nominees.  If the Conservative government makes this change, however, it should be applied to all law enforcement positions, not just Officers of Parliament.
 
“To end patronage and cronyism in appointments, opposition party leaders should be given the power to approve or reject the Prime Minister’s nominees with reasons for rejections made public, especially for appointments to law enforcement positions,” said Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch.

- 30 -

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
dwatch@web.net

Democracy Watch's Voter Rights Campaign

Democracy Watch homepage

Conservative Party of Canada platform webpage