![]() |
News Release
APPOINTMENTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT POSITIONS
SHOULD HAVE APPROVAL OF ALL PARTY LEADERS --
HEARINGS YESTERDAY, CONSERVATIVES’ ELECTION PLEDGES
NOT ENOUGH
TO CHECK PRIME MINISTER’S POWER
“If there are any other initiatives that align with our principles,
we will attempt to make those changes as well.”
Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking about the planned “Federal
Accountability Act”
January 26, 2006
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
OTTAWA - Today, Democracy Watch called on Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
and the leaders of the other three federal political parties with elected
MPs, to modify the Conservatives planned “Federal Accountability Act” to
democratize the federal government’s appointment process for all positions
involved in law enforcement, including judges and the boards and heads
of all enforcement agencies, boards, tribunals and commissions.
Yesterday, in a public hearing Marshall Rothstein, Harper’s nominee
for Supreme Court justice, was questioned in a very limited way by a committee
of MPs. While the hearing introduced transparency to the appointment
process, the fact that the committee had no power to approve or reject
the Prime Minister’s nominee means that the process did not, in any effective
way, check the Prime Minister’s appointment power.
In the Conservatives’ election platform, they pledged to make the following
changes:
“Ensure that all Officers of Parliament are appointed through consultation with all parties in the House of Commons and confirmed through a secret ballot of all Members of Parliament, not just named by the Prime Minister. This appointment process will cover: - The Ethics Commissioner - The Auditor General - The Chief Electoral Officer - The Information Commissioner - The Privacy Commissioner - The Registrar of Lobbyists; [and] Establish a Public Appointments Commission to set merit-based requirements for appointments to government boards, commissions, and agencies, to ensure that competitions for posts are widely publicized and fairly conducted.”While the establishment of a Commission to ensure merit-based appointments will be a positive step forward, Democracy Watch believes that a secret ballot vote is not an effective check on the Prime Minister’s appointment power because if the ruling party holds a majority of seats in Parliament, it is very likely that MPs from the ruling party will rubber-stamp the Prime Minister’s nominees. If the Conservative government makes this change, however, it should be applied to all law enforcement positions, not just Officers of Parliament.
- 30 -
FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
Duff Conacher, Coordinator of Democracy Watch
Tel: (613) 241-5179
dwatch@web.net
Democracy Watch's Voter Rights Campaign
Democracy Watch homepage
Conservative Party of Canada platform webpage